<p>To whom it may concern:
</p><p>The Republic of NZRE has recently become a victim of impersonation when the entire page containing information on our nation was reproduced and slightly changed. The illegitimate page describes a "micronation" known as "NZE Empire" which is clearly derived from the old name of the Republic of NZRE, "NZRE Empire." The crime is evident: seeing as on the page not all instances of the word "NZRE" were replaced with "NZE." There is also a second page created from another case of impersonation against the Republic of NZRE. Our government requests that Micronations Fandom remove these fake pages and punish the offenders appropriately.
</p><p>
</p><p>
Links to the false page(s):
</p><p>http://micronations.wikia.com/wiki/NZE_Empire#
</p><p>https://micronations.wikia.com/wiki/Nzite
</p><p>Links to the original page(s):
</p><p>https://micronations.wikia.com/wiki/NZRE
</p><p>Links to the offending person(s):
</p><p>https://micronations.wikia.com/wiki/User:Jayflem
</p><p>
</p><p>
If you have any questions or wish to discuss with us: please either reach us on here or via nzregov@gmail.com
</p><p>Thank you for your time and I look forward to working with you to solve this matter.
</p><p>Regards,
</p><p>Emperor Zack
</p><p>Republic of NZRE
</p>
592
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by Emperor Zack
<p>The Republic of NZRE is satisfied if everyone else is.
</p><p>Thank you User:Austenasia for your hard work and fair administration. We look forward to a clean and informative wiki under you. NZRE will support you.
</p><p>
Emperor Zack </p><p>Republic of NZRE </p>
Emperor Zack </p><p>Republic of NZRE </p>
(Edited by Emperor Zack)
<p>I support the removal of Kaiser. The evidence against him is overwhelming and his rebuttals do not convince me.
</p>
(Edited by Emperor Zack)
<p>Hello,
</p><p>I agree with Austenasia. A referendum should be held to solve this problem. Ultimately, the community of micronationalists are the ones that should decide who will administer this wiki. Not only will this referendum undeniably solve this issue, but it will offer the community a chance to choose their admin.
</p><p>- Emperor Zack, Republic of NZRE
</p>
(Edited by Emperor Zack)
<div class="quote"><i>Deutschlandkaiser wrote:<div class="quote">Emperor Zack wrote:<div class="quote">Emperor Nathan wrote:
OPPOSE. We cannot have a fair and free Wiki if there are no checks on the admins' power. I say that we hire as many admins as possible. <p>Also, Kaiser (more like Führer) has done a horrible job managing MicroWiki. He is the engine of censorship; his regime is the opposite of what a wiki should be. His "clean-up" has failed. I say that we remove him from power. </p> </i></div>
OPPOSE. Kaiser we urge you to reconsider. If you have any intention of keeping MicroWiki free, then you cannot be the only admin. I suggest at least three admins that can check each others' power. If those that oppose this end up banned for this, you will all see what we mean.</div>Read the above statements. There will be additional staff for checks and balances. </div> <p>Will said staff also be bureaucrats? And will they hold the same about of power as you do? </p>
OPPOSE. We cannot have a fair and free Wiki if there are no checks on the admins' power. I say that we hire as many admins as possible. <p>Also, Kaiser (more like Führer) has done a horrible job managing MicroWiki. He is the engine of censorship; his regime is the opposite of what a wiki should be. His "clean-up" has failed. I say that we remove him from power. </p> </i></div>
OPPOSE. Kaiser we urge you to reconsider. If you have any intention of keeping MicroWiki free, then you cannot be the only admin. I suggest at least three admins that can check each others' power. If those that oppose this end up banned for this, you will all see what we mean.</div>Read the above statements. There will be additional staff for checks and balances. </div> <p>Will said staff also be bureaucrats? And will they hold the same about of power as you do? </p>
(Edited by Emperor Zack)
<div class="quote"><i>Emperor Nathan wrote:
OPPOSE. We cannot have a fair and free Wiki if there are no checks on the admins' power. I say that we hire as many admins as possible. <p>Also, Kaiser (more like Führer) has done a horrible job managing MicroWiki. He is the engine of censorship; his regime is the opposite of what a wiki should be. His "clean-up" has failed. I say that we remove him from power. </p> </i></div>
<p>OPPOSE. Kaiser we urge you to reconsider. If you have any intention of keeping MicroWiki free, then you cannot be the only admin. I suggest at least three admins that can check each others' power. If those that oppose this end up banned for this, you will all see what we mean. </p>
OPPOSE. We cannot have a fair and free Wiki if there are no checks on the admins' power. I say that we hire as many admins as possible. <p>Also, Kaiser (more like Führer) has done a horrible job managing MicroWiki. He is the engine of censorship; his regime is the opposite of what a wiki should be. His "clean-up" has failed. I say that we remove him from power. </p> </i></div>
<p>OPPOSE. Kaiser we urge you to reconsider. If you have any intention of keeping MicroWiki free, then you cannot be the only admin. I suggest at least three admins that can check each others' power. If those that oppose this end up banned for this, you will all see what we mean. </p>
(Edited by Emperor Zack)